Spirituality, Religion, Nature

 

 

 

 

The Name of God:

 

Is it Noun or Verb?

 

 

We start this reflection wondering whether God is a verb or a noun; whether its name is verb or noun; whether when we call God in prayer, we are calling to a noun or to a verb. These are not small things but a subject with a profound meaning; in particular, this is the clearest way to see and understand how “All-that-Is” is God, as you’ll see.

 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: yhwh (Read it from right to left). The Tetragrammaton (word with four letters) YHWH, or Yahweh in English, (incorrectly translated also as Jehovah), refers to the Hebrew name for the God of Israel. It is translated into English as Lord, often written with capital letters as in the Hebrew Bible.

 

YHWH in Hebrew means I am, and as such is a verb. That was the name chosen by God when Moses said to God, "Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, 'The God of your fathers has sent me to you, 'and they ask me, 'What is his name?' Then what shall I tell them?’ God said to Moses, ‘I am who I am.  This is what you are to say to the Israelites: I AM has sent me to you.'” It is meaningful and worthy of consideration to see why God wanted to be named by a verb.

 

Names are no more than names in most modern languages, as Steven, or Nancy; they are just names. That is not so in Hebrew culture where the names of persons and places mean what the person or place is or should be. Within this culture each name has a meaning, and the chosen name of God must also be meaningful.

 

What then does the biblical “I Am” mean? As a verb it means an act, the act of being, or simply To Be. But all verbs require a subject to execute their proper acts, and the subject of “to be” is always a being, something that is. When we apply this to God, the subject of to be in God is “I.” In the physical world the subjects performing actions are different from the actions they execute: one is the subject who loves, and another thing is the act of loving; and we may say the same of all actions or happenings in the universe: one is the Sun, and another thing its act of shining, heating or radiating; and so on.

 

Each object that exist in the world is a compositum, a composition of a generic nature common to all entities belonging to the same nature, and some particular or individual characteristics exclusive of each particular entity, which distinguishes it from others of the same genus or nature; a general quality or condition common to many, and being an individual entity which distinguishes one object from others. For instance, every human being has something common to all men/women, and something which distinguishes one from others, Nancy from Paul. All men/women are rational animals (their nature), but every individual has some characteristics which distinguish one from the other. These characterists are the “whatness,” the “whichness” of every thing: which is it? This is what distinguishes Nancy from Paul; a mouse or stone from another one. This is the individual quiddity, exclusive of each one. Please read the note.[1]

 

Not so in God: in God the act of being, “Am,” identifies with the subject “I.” The whatness or whoness of God is the same as its being; the “what” or “who” of God, and its being, are the same reality. This means that God’s nature and God’s essence identify. This is an exclusive property of God, and it is the opposite of what happens in all objects of the universe where their nature and their essence are different. Only in God the verb and the noun identify.

 

We’d see clearer the concept of God (although always limited) if we’d see God as “To Be” (a verb, an action) instead of “The Being” (a subject), because God is primarily an action, actus purus, one pure act: To Be; and whenever and wherever something is, God is. God is simply this act: Being!  So, the answer to the initial question whether God, or his name, is noun or verb, is that God is verb.

 

When we pray to God, the Being, we are praying to an Action, to a Verb. It is true however that, given the fact that “The Being” and “To Be” in God identify, as I said; and given that the totality of being, all-that-is, is God, then, when we pray to To-Be, we are implicitly praying to The Being.

 

All proper philosophical and theological names or qualities of God may be converted into verbs; and, if there would be a property that couldn’t be converted into a verb, it would mean that that property or quality is not appropriately said of God. There are, for example, nouns as Creator, Existence, Life, or Action, that can be expressed through verbs, as to create, to exist, to live, to act, and God “is” such acts. The verb from Energy (that I use so often in my writings) is to energize, or the equivalents to do something with power, to produce something with force, to create, to move, to change. So, this name Energy is very meaningful in God, as I have elaborated in other reflections.

 

Regarding the name Lord, it has some equivalent verbs as to dominate, to command, to lead. The name Father is also to beget, to create. The name Holy so often used in the Scriptures (and in my writings) would mean to make holy or to consecrate (in Latin sanctificare, sacrare, consecrare). Wisdom identifies with to see, to know, to intuit.

 

It is important to observe, however, that all verbs or properties of God are said of him analogically, and under the principle that any verb is an action that is, an act, and God is “Total-Is,” ”Total-Action,” “All-To-Be.” Although, God does not have “properties” in plural because he is one Action: To Be. If we’d give different names to God, or talk about different properties (or verbs) in God, we’d say that only for our understanding. God is the simplest being, just one Action, fullness of Being: he Is.

 

Am I therefore God since I am too? Is my body God? No, my body is not God; no material thing of the universe is God; material things are limited, temporal, contingent beings; no contingent subject or object, no body or matter of the world is God, the noun. But the important point here are not the nouns but the verb, the act of being which is common and one with the to be of God, because God is “The Total To Be.” So, there is plurality of nouns, subjects or objects, but there is “identity” in the act of being, the verb.

 

We are bearers of the Principle of all being by which we came to be and by which we continue existing. Our existence is a given, a constantly, “repeatedly” receiving of our existence at each instant (there are not repeated actions in God). There is therefore something divine in everyone and in everything, a “hidden” Action which the whole universe holds. By this Action the whole universe is somehow “divinized,” made sacred, holy, consecrated; it belongs to God; rather, it “is” God! I’ll explain it.

 

The “who” or “what” of all objects of the world, and the “who” or “what” of God are different, but the to be of all objective reality that exists or may exist is one and common to God and the world. This objective reality and God look in our mind as two different beings, but in God’s mind is one. God intuits the essences of all objects of the world and sees them as a likelihood of his own essence which is the wholeness of To Be. If God would miss any being, he wouldn’t be “The Total To Be” as by nature he is, and all beings one in him.

 

This “unity [2] God-Universe could be understood in terms of the Aristotelian and Thomistic philosophy saying that to exist is genus and, as such, it is common to God and creatures, and can be equally said of God and of the universe. God is not the individual beings or nouns, subjects or objects of the world (otherwise there would be an infinite number of “Gods”), but God is the whole being: To-Be.

 

There is then in the objects of the universe something more than we see and touch. “Behind” and “beyond” what we see in the physical world there is an Intelligence and Power that cannot be seen or measured, which is the meaning and the explanation of the universe.

 

As you may see, in these reflections we are always going back and forth, affirming the unity God-Universe, and accentuating also the difference. And it is so, because “before” something existed God “was,” He always is. One thing is to look at the individuality of all subjects or objects of the world, and another one is to see that they are existences, and their existence is like “parts” of the Fullness of Existence, who is All Being, God.

 

I have written many times that we are “inside” God, or in God; but that is not exactly the fact; we are not in God; instead, our existence, the universe’s existence “is” God, the Existence itself; no multiplicity but simplicity: To-Be.

 

In conclusion, the God we cherish so much is the plenitude of the verb To-Be in all forms of being, the fullness of being, whichever it might be. There is no other God than this as Isaiah said: I am Yahweh, and there is no other one, I am “Am!” [3] Our fantasy may create a kind of subject “there,” and call it God; but there is no such a being “there;” that “God” would be only in our imagination. The only existing God is Being.

 

This eternal, atemporal “To Be” is an Action of infinite Wisdom, incommensurable Power, indescribable Force that we cannot imagine; it is a Beginning without beginning and has no end. He cannot cease to be because his nature is precisely To Be. He is a simple and spiritual Action who lives in an immutable and simultaneous present. He is a rational Intelligence, immaterial and metaphysical Being. And I think he is supernatural because, according what we know about the world, there is not sufficient explanation for its existence, but presupposes an Intelligence, Wisdom and Power “behind” it. We have marvelous theories regarding the evolution, and about the expansion and contraction of the universe, but we do not have the evidence (and so, the theory) that the universe could exist by itself, unless we see a kind of “identification” God-Universe. [4]

 

So, the whole universe is held by To-Be, and we may resort to him for sustenance, assistance, and light.

 

Finally, a talk about human life. To be is good because this makes us “like Gods;” it is great to exist, especially when there is health and means of subsistence; but in reality our individual existence, all nouns, subjects and objects of the universe do not matter; they are ephemeral, passing, temporal. The only thing that counts at the end is the verb: God is!

 

 

Go to Content

 

HTM NATURE / NOUN VERB NATURE  03-12-11

 



[1] In scholastic philosophy, quiddity (Latin quidditas) was another term for the essence of an object, literally its ‘whatness,’ or ‘what it is.’ The term derives from the Latin word ‘quidditas,’ which was used by the medieval Scholastics as a literal translation of the equivalent term in Aristotle's Greek. It describes the properties that a particular substance (e.g. a person) shares with others of its kind. The question ‘what is it?’ (quid est? in Latin, and hence quidditas) asks for a general description by way of commonality. This is the quiddity or ‘whatness’ (i.e., its ‘what it is’). Quiddity was often contrasted by the scholastic philosophers with the haecceity or ‘thisness’ of an item, which was supposed to be a positive characteristic of an individual that caused them to be this individual, and no other. (Quote from Wikipedia, slightly edited.)

[2] When I use the words unity  or identity talking about God-universe I use them in quotation marks because these words are only analogies of that incomprehensible and ineffable act “God.” God is the totality of being which is impossible to be described with words.

[3] The famous and authoritative Spanish translation of the Bible from the originals by Casiodoro de Reina (1569), and revised by Cipriano de Valera (1602), translates this verse of Isaiah this way: Yo soy Yahweh, y ninguno más hay, which I literally interpret as “I am Yahweh, and there is no other one.” God is the only one who may say: “I am “Am,” and there is no one like him.

[4] Se reflection Whether the Idea of God is Superfluous? - Reflections About an Eternal Universe